<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what&#8217;s the cheapest way to ship a mailing tube through usps?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.massemailinglist.com/2009/12/whats-the-cheapest-way-to-ship-a-mailing-tube-through-usps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.massemailinglist.com/2009/12/whats-the-cheapest-way-to-ship-a-mailing-tube-through-usps/</link>
	<description>mass email list</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: joshuajava</title>
		<link>http://www.massemailinglist.com/2009/12/whats-the-cheapest-way-to-ship-a-mailing-tube-through-usps/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuajava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.massemailinglist.com/2009/12/whats-the-cheapest-way-to-ship-a-mailing-tube-through-usps/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Well for a couple of bucks more you could have used Priority Mail and your tube would have gotten to its destination within 2-3 days instead of 6-10 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well for a couple of bucks more you could have used Priority Mail and your tube would have gotten to its destination within 2-3 days instead of 6-10 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

